Looking for my next
opportunity
to make an impact on the laws and social change driven by the commercial applications of generative artificial intelligence.
 

By leveraging my experience as a litigator, I can see around corners and anticipate legal risks. I have represented groups of consumers and shareholders that sued tech companies like Zoom, Robinhood, and Slack. My work included analysis of the defendant companies' internal documents and consultations with expert witnesses. This experience enables me to identify legal risks that arise from company operations and product design. 

My current focus is the many open legal questions raised by recent advances in artificial intelligence. For example, do companies like OpenAI and Microsoft have to give credit to open-source programmers whose code was used to make a commercial product like Github Copilot? If a person makes a children's book using pictures created from an open-source image-generating AI like Stable Diffusion, who has ownership interest in those pictures? What if those pictures included the image or likeness of a celebrity? If publicly-available recordings of a person's voice were used to create an AI voice for a podcast, is using that voice without the person's permission considered identity theft? I explore these questions and more in my blog. If you're curious, check it out! 

 

Get in touch with me if you love to chat about the intersection of law, generative artificial intelligence, and the social change coming from this new technology.

 

--Noorjahan Rahman
​